![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| WSBA Info | For Lawyers | For the Public | For the Media | CLE |
| | Bench Bar Guidelines | News Releases | Publications | |
|
April 2004Addressing the Civil Legal Needs of Sexual-Assault VictimsLegal resources to stabilize the physical, emotional, and financial welfare of the victimby Catherine A. Carroll When most people think about rape and the law, they think of criminal justice. Yet few people understand the powerful effect sexual assault can have on a victim's entire social and economic life. One incident of sexual assault can destabilize a victim's housing, schooling, privacy, employment, immigration status, and basic long-term financial welfare. To address the civil legal needs of victims and to prevent long-term socio-economic harm, our nation needs to change how it responds legally to allegations of rape. Instead of focusing our legal resources exclusively on the issue of criminal sanctions against the assailant, we need to concentrate our legal resources on stabilizing the physical, emotional, and financial welfare of the victim. We need to keep victims in school, keep them employed, and protect their privacy. Yet, on a practical level, to accomplish this paradigm shift we must establish that sexual-assault victims are entitled to restorative civil remedies regardless of the status of criminal sanctions against the assailant. Today, many of the civil remedies that sexual-assault victims need depend either technically or discretionarily upon criminal-justice outcomes. On a technical level in Washington, for example, a victim cannot access state victim-compensation programs unless she1 cooperates with law enforcement. On a discretionary level, most third-party institutions and decisionmakers, such as housing authorities, schools, and employers, are extraordinarily wary of imposing significant restrictions on an assailant unless criminal charges exist. Landlords, employers, and educators send the message, "I do not want to decide a rape case. That should be handled by the criminal courts." The current paradigm — making basic civil remedies for sexual-assault survivors dependent upon the outcome of the criminal justice system — is problematic, for two reasons. First, rape remains the most underreported crime in America. In Washington, one in three adult women have experienced sexual assault in their lifetime.2 Only 15 percent of those victims reported the crime to law-enforcement authorities. Nationally only five percent of college victims report. Of those reports, approximately 24 percent result in an indictment and 12.5 percent result in conviction. This means that approximately 75 percent of the rapes reported to law enforcement are never prosecuted. Given this reality, if civil remedies are contingent on criminal justice outcomes, the vast majority of victims are left without any assistance. Second, to have any meaning and to prevent serious harm, most civil remedies (housing, protection orders, privacy, education, employment, etc.) need to be secured quickly in the weeks to months following an assault. However, the time from indictment and arraignment to a plea or trial in a criminal case may take up to two years, and appeals can take even longer. Most victims will have left their jobs, their housing, or their educational institution by the time a criminal sanction is imposed. Civil issues for sexual-assault survivors are a complex range of legal matters. Below is a general overview of the civil needs of sexual-assault survivors. Privacy Vital to protecting a sexual-assault victim's right to privacy is preventing the unauthorized disclosure of information about the victim. Attorneys can conduct preventive measures on behalf of victims by discouraging the unauthorized disclosure of private information. Sexual-assault victims often lack adequate representation to protect their privacy interests in criminal cases where they are a victim-witness. Prosecutors are limited in their ability to protect the privacy interests of victims, and often victims do not know what their rights are with respect to the criminal-justice system. Protection orders However, protection orders may not be an available remedy for sexual-assault victims, given the status of the relationship with the assailant. Although a victim may pursue an anti-harassment order if she does not meet the relationship requirements of a domestic-violence protection order, it may be difficult to obtain one if the assault has not risen to a "pattern of conduct." Therefore, safety planning is very important. Financial compensation In Washington, Crime Victims' Compensation covers the cost of all rape exams if conducted to collect evidence for possible prosecution. However, the reality is that victims need to do more than just report sexual assault to law enforcement to receive assistance. It is not uncommon for victims to experience challenges when attempting to receive victims' compensation benefits. Employment In Washington, unemployment benefits have been extended to victims of domestic violence and stalking — but not to victims of sexual assault. Education Appreciating a school's policies with respect to sexual assault is fundamental to representing victims in school disciplinary hearings. It is not uncommon for policies to call for mediation between the assailant and the victim. This is potentially very damaging to victims and can further traumatize them. Housing Immigration Criminal justice Suing the assailant, and third-party liability The victim may have a right of action against third parties who owe the victim a duty of care and who failed to prevent the assault because of their negligence. Owners or operators of convenience stores, universities and colleges, commercial landlords, bus stations, hospitals, high schools, restaurants, bars, parking lots, hotels, and other third parties may be liable if the victim can establish that a legal duty exists to protect individuals from foreseeable violent acts. Such cases may include negligent hiring, retention, or supervision of an employee if the employer should have known the employee presented a risk of danger to others. Last, if a special relationship exists between an employer and the victim that requires a duty of reasonable care to protect the victim from all foreseeable harms — including sexual assault — there may be a basis for a vicarious-liability cause of action against the third-party employer. (Niece v. Elmview Group Home, 131 Wn.2d 39, 929 P.2d 420 (1997).) For additional information, see Guide for Civil Law Suits, a tool for victims of sexual assault, available on the legal page of the Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs (WCSAP) website at www.wcsap.org. Most attorneys do not enter the legal profession to work with rape victims. It is difficult work. It requires a degree of personal attention, patience, and compassion that our training in law school and beyond rarely provides. In Washington, victims of sexual assault are entitled to a support person to accompany them to all proceedings — legal and medical. Advocates can provide support to attorneys working with victims and are an invaluable resource. (RCW 70.125.030.) Unfortunately, we live in a country where sexual assault is common. However, much of it is denied, shamed into silence and ultimately left to erode the emotional, physical, and financial welfare of many in our communities. Appreciating the complex range of civil issues that may impact a sexual-assault survivor is the first step towards shifting the current paradigm. As attorneys, we have great power to make a difference in people's lives. Working with rape survivors is an opportunity to provide civil representation in a complex and emerging area of law that attorneys can shape in order to meet the needs of sexual-assault clients. April is Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. It is my hope that our collective professional awareness rises to appreciate that sexual-assault victims are entitled to restorative civil remedies regardless of the status of criminal sanctions against the assailant. Indeed, this is how we begin to transform our nation's response to rape beyond the criminal-justice system. ___________________________ NOTES 2 Sexual Assault Experiences and Perceptions of Community Response to Sexual Assault: A Survey of Washington State Women. Principal investigator: Lucy Berliner, Harborview Center for Sexual Assault and Traumatic Stress; research consultant: David Fine; survey research coordinator, Danna Moore, Washington State University/Social and Economic Sciences. Research supported by: Office of Crime Victims Advocacy, Washington State Office of Community Development. November 2001. For the complete report, including methodology, see http://depts.washington.edu/hcsats/pdf/research/sexualassaultexpr2001-11.pdf. |